Clarifying Information
General
By definition, a self-settled trust is established for the benefit of the grantor/beneficiary. When reviewing trusts under this rule, the agency essentially ignores any restrictions or requirements written into the trust. This includes disregarding:
- The purpose for establishing a trust;
- Whether the trustees have or may exercise any discretion under the terms of the trust;
- Restrictions on when or whether distributions may be made from the trust; and
- Restrictions on the use of distributions from the trust.
After disregarding the above, whether an irrevocable self-settled trust is a resource or not is whether the trust principle or income can be used for the beneficiary. It will be extremely rare, if possible at all, that a self-settled irrevocable trust cannot be used for the benefit of the beneficiary.
Can/Cannot Example 1: An irrevocable self-settled trust states the trust cannot be used for medical expenses for the beneficiary. We disregard this restriction, the trust can be used for the grantor/beneficiary.
Can/Cannot Example 2: An irrevocable self-settled trust gives the trustee complete discretion on when to use trust assets. The trustee states they will never use the trust assets. We disregard the trustee’s discretion, the trust can be used for the grantor/beneficiary.
Once it is determine whether a trust can be used for the beneficiary, we must evaluate the trust’s resources and income.
Resource Example: As of the first of the month, a client has personal property, a car for transportation, and $50,000 in cash in a trust. The countable resource value of the trust is $50,000 because the personal property and car are excluded resources.
Income Example: Using the same trust above, the trustee buys a plane ticket for the client for $1,000 from the trust in February 2018. This withdraw is countable unearned income for February 2018, even if the client did not directly receive the cash. Because the $1,000 in income was withdrawn from the $50,000 in cash, resources for February 2018 would be reduced by $1,000.
Institutionalization Example: Same trust as above, but the client also has their home in the trust. If the client is applying for a noninstitutional Medicaid program (for example, S02 or L52), the home is an excluded resource. However, if the client is institutionalized in a nursing home and is applying for nursing home coverage, or the client is applying for a home and community-based (HCB) waiver, the home is not excluded.
The August 1, 2003 Cutoff
From August 11, 1993, to July 31, 2003, the definition of a self-settled trust for a married individual was narrower than it is today. A trust was only self-settled if all or a portion of the assets in the trust were from the client. This means that if all assets in the trust were solely the spouse’s assets, and the client is the beneficiary, the trust would be third-party. However, we would still analyze whether the trust was a countable resource for the spouse (assuming the spouse could also receive some benefit from the trust). Further, we would need sufficient evidence that all assets in the trust were separate property of the spouse, and not community property.
As of August 1, 2003, it does not matter whose assets of the married couple is in the trust. If the trust is for the benefit of the client, and at least some assets in the trust were from the client or the client’s spouse, it is a self-settled trust.
Additional information about Trusts can be found on the Trusts page.